REBELLION,REVOLUTION,RESENTMENT

Rebellion is saying "NO" for the first time and staying with it after that. People rebel when they are on the angry stomach, have lost everything they had valued...but the last thraw is same in every case, that is , the threat of losing the self-respect. This anger then boils up....bursts like a volcano engulfing the very cause of it....it bursts out to take revenge.from the very people who had treated their subjects like dirt for all these years.......

But is it true that every rebellion is a revenge?? A resentment??

Perhaps we need to define both the resentment as well as the rebellion???

Resentment is for something that we do not possess, while rebellion is saying no for something we already possess. It is a fight of what is "LEFT IN US"
And for which we rebel fights for something which each human being possess irrespective of social status, nationality,gender, colour and race  ,that is, basic tenets of Human dignity-freedom, equality and fraternity.

A true rebel values what is common to all the humaity...not to his class only...rebellions will keep failing if people do not realize that they need to fight on the basic human values-values that are common to people you are fighting against too .

That is why Mahatma Gandhi wanted a revolution of Non-violence because he was afraid of one fact only that is, the Independence movement moving out of its humble beginnings based on equality into the bloody backlash  by the Indain population, thus losing out its moral value.

There is a thin line between rebellion and resentment- But the basis of a rebellion are Universal values rather then narrow class wars of resentment. French revolution is a classic example of rebellion based on Universal values spiralling out of control into a resentment. As soon as a rebellion slips into resentment, it ceases to be "morally right revolt"

If you resent the rich and you want to kill them for their richness, then you are not really a rebel ...you are merely a resenter...you want something that you do not possess i.e. their wealth.You are merely disguising your anger as a rebellion.
I want you to know therefore that if you value life of your fellow men and you are prepared to fight for them...do value life of the oppressors too....We need to destroy the "symbols" and "ideas"only-we need not to destory precious Human lives for this.

WALL STREET PROTESTS: DO YOUR JUSTICE

A government----a government which is democratic, republic and a harbinger for bringing world freedom has thrown away its mask today...

Where is the accountability of the government...the protestors are not protesting against anything bad...there is no armed revolt...why then scores of policemen are being sent to control them

as I had said earlier...the primary job of government is to deliever justice. The very day it deviates from this it looses its right to call itself a government..
If a government is too incompetent to deliver justice and is so impotent to send police against its own people but not to arrest the real culprits..

then do away with..
 take justice in your own hands...lynch them...kill them...

they deserve this..

they are the sinners not only  of America but of a person sitting empty handed in Bangladesh too...you will be serving the world by delievring this justice..

Enough of the greed of those sitting in the street...enough of the casino capitalism...enough of these blood-sucking rich gambling on the resources which are produced by boiling blood and sweat....and

Enough of the government who is sending police to arrest us...

My dear brothers and sisters in America...I truely support your endeavour....take justice in your own hands now....in the war between Government and people...Numbers always win......

COMRADES- GET READY FOR INFOWAR



"Information is the seed for an idea, and only grows when it's watered.”-Heinz V. Berzen

Why the government tries to control information?  Information that is not until and unless relates to very sensitive issues such as Military matters should be open to all, yet all government fears the free flow of the information.

 The reason is the obvious, the information has the potential to generate new ideas.Information leads to free exchange of ideas which in the due course of time leads to the pathbreaking new ideas. Any new idea is detrimental to the old stucture or old fabric. It is obvious that any new idea is normally related to either the social or the political matters. And therefore the new ideas are seen as something feared upon by the governments. Whether the government is the democratic or autocratic, whether  it is United states or the Iran, they all share one thing and that is a free flow of inforamtion between the citizens of the country. All to curb generation of new ideas that can prove to be dangerous for the elites sitting in these governments.

Internet is one of the most important tools in the hand of common man today for bringing about a positive change in the society. This positive change if you ask any citizen of a country, he will say that he would like the positive change to happen in the political sphere. In fact he would most likely place the political change prior to the social change.

Governments fear this and now there is increased scrutinity of the informations exchanged on the e-platform. Numerous websites especially like Wikileaks has been banned....why because they strip all the sheaths of the government.

Why governments wants to conceal information? So that nobody can know how much they siphon off the taxpayers money, or how many people are killed in the jungles of kenya, or how many of the people are tortured in Guatnamo....

Friends that battlefield has changed..we are no longer fighting the monster on the ground...though we wil continue to fight on the streets...we need to unite to ward off the evil from another battlefield...let's get ready for the big battle....let's equip each other on technology and knowledge tools...1 billion computer experts will be difficult to stop...let's make lives of those sitting in the secret services of China and CIA offices a little bit difficult...

WHILE WORLD WAS WATCHING LIBYA.....

Gaddaffi has been a darling of westerm media though in a negative sense since last 40 years. So the Libyan uprising was a main story that was being followed all the past 6 months. The fall of Gaddaffi got the media limelight. It is kind of strange that at certain times media gets involved with one news so much that they forget that there can be things that are going on with equal significance...
A case here is the "missed" news of what has been occuring in Syria. More than 3,000 protesters have been killed, many more injured, and thousands detained. Dozens of detainees have reportedly been tortured and killed.
The news of Syria was more important because of that the fact that there is a complete Royal house ruling it, a "real" case of dark aged Monarchy in our world.Regime change in Libya is more important as a major step of overthrowing absolute monarchy from the world. The Libyan bloodbath obscured an important happening in the middle east.
The effect has been that an international pressure which was required for regime change in Syria was directed to the Libya
Though the result has been good,yet world need not to forget that there is still an unfinished task after Gadaffi and that is to boot out Assad....

RUSTED CROWNS

I am sometimes astonished by the fact that how the most democratic countries in the world like Britain, Spain, Portugal, are still not republic. Why there are still token monarch in these countries?

It is obvious for any democratic country to remove the aristocratic rule of the dark ages as it transcends to the democratic rule. Still why is that there are threads of the feudal age left in this countries( and no matter we love them too......)

The idea of democracy and republic was borne in response to the feudalism and absolute authority of the monarchs.Now when we have realised the idea of power to people, we have decided to keep the very people whom we were against as our national heads. Don't this anomaly reflects a basic flaw of humans and that is to avoid taking responsibility of our future. Or we have grown so used to the idea of authority that we  cannot remove it straight away.

Or the thing which makes me shudder is the idea that we perhaps"love authority" due to our "evolutionary origins".  Otherwise how can we explain the reason that people love rejoicing the marriage of British royal house when in fact the exchequer is paying from their pockets(in the midst of tough times). And millions of people watch the live telecast of ROYALS WHO ARE ROYALS FROM ONLY BLOODLINES !!!!!!!!!! 

 This is nothing but love for authority...and more so a lack of willingness to take responsibility of the future(and that is why you still dwell in past.....come on you are not living in an empire now!!!). Authroity dwells on the idea that people do not want to take responsibility.

Anyhow, reasons apart, these token monarchs still represent a authority. An authority can be token but it is still an authority. You KNOW what I really mean if you are an anarchist........